Mind the Gap

Thursday, August 30, 2007

Decimal syntax

›
On this topic , Danny Coward recently referred to a limited form of operator overloading specifically for BigDecimal. Good to know this is ...
4 comments:
Wednesday, August 29, 2007

Is enjoyable standards work a contradiction in terms?

›
Eric Newcomer says he's enjoyed working in the OSGi Enterprise Expert Group. From my experience of the OSGi Core Platform Expert Group,...
Thursday, August 16, 2007

JSR 291 goes Final Release

›
The last administrative hurdle for JSR 291 has been cleared and the spec., RI, and TCK are now available, either via the JCP site or direct...
Monday, July 23, 2007

JCP Awards

›
The JCP awards brightened up a wet Monday morning. The Apache Software Foundation got the "Member of the Year" (!) award for its c...
Monday, July 16, 2007

Java modularity: where do we go from here?

›
Things have moved on somewhat since March , so I thought an update would be helpful. Let's recap first. JSR 277 is trying to create a s...
6 comments:
Monday, July 02, 2007

New development models for IBM

›
IBM launched Project Zero on Friday. The aim is to provide simpler ways to build web applications using an approach termed Community-Driven...
19 comments:
Friday, June 29, 2007

JSR 291 but not as we know it

›
Google sometimes coughs up unexpected stuff, like this which could almost be talking about JSR 291 and JSR 277. :-)
Thursday, June 28, 2007

Eclipse Europa

›
Coté's coverage of Eclipse Europa expresses a view on OSGi and JSR 277.
Friday, June 22, 2007

Representations of module dependencies

›
One of the key differences between JSR 291 and JSR 277 is the way in which module dependencies are represented, satisfied, and managed. Both...

Module-superpackage relationship

›
In the comparison of JSR 277 and JSR 291 features, I alluded to the fact that the module-superpackage relationship is a difference, but And...

Sun VP 'gets' OSGi

›
I just ran across a video where James Governor interviews Jeet Kaul, the VP of developer products and programmes for Sun Microsystems. If y...
4 comments:
Wednesday, June 20, 2007

Default export granularity

›
In the comparison of JSR 277 and JSR 291 features, I caused some confusion by saying the default export granularity was 'class' fo...
4 comments:
Monday, June 18, 2007

Comparison of JSR 277 and JSR 291 features

›
A number of people have expressed an interest in the similaries and differences between these JSRs, so this post compares the features of th...
12 comments:
Friday, June 15, 2007

One last hurdle for JSR 291?

›
The PMO acknowledged receipt of the Final Release materials I sent them a couple of days ago, so at least their email system worked this ti...
4 comments:
Wednesday, June 13, 2007

JSR 291 Final Release on its way

›
"But I thought JSR 291 had already gone final?", I hear you say. Nope: it passed the Final Approval Ballot a few weeks ago, but i...
Monday, June 11, 2007

IcedTea fork of OpenJDK

›
This news has been around for a few days, but I heard it first from the JavaPosse . Red Hat has forked OpenJDK and plans to fill the encumb...
Friday, June 08, 2007

JSR 277 and JSR 294 observer lists

›
You may like to know there is a public observer list for JSR 277 and one for JSR 294 too, both with publicly visible archives. This is not...

OSGi community event

›
The OSGi community event in Munich is approaching fast. I can't make it, but I know there will be good speakers including BJ Hargrave, ...

Adrian Colyer on Spring & OSGi

›
Just dipped into one or two segments of Adrian Colyer's InfoQ video interview on Spring & OSGi . There are bookmarks for anyone else...
Monday, June 04, 2007

More OSGi tutorials

›
Neil Bartlett has published another excellent OSGi tutorial in his EclipseZone series , this time introducing Declarative Services. A must f...
‹
›
Home
View web version
Powered by Blogger.